Commentaire
Some worthwhile online reference sites to read about hard lessons learned regarding this topic from other jurisdictions
www.mdpi.com/journal/recycling - specifically their article "Assessment of Public Opposition to Construction and Demolition Waste Facilities: A Case Study in Australia"
www.sciencedirect.com - Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2016 "Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: management issues"
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233626/ - Waste Incineration & Public Health, Chapter 7 "Social Issues and Public Interactions"
Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment - "GUIDE FOR IDENTIFYING, EVALUATING AND
SELECTING POLICIES FOR INFLUENCING CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION AND DEMOLITION
WASTE MANAGEMENT" - 2019
www.ejnet.org/ej/ - Environmental Justice Network - Cerrell Associates Report to California Waste Management Board: "Political Difficulties Facing Waste-to-Energy Conversion Plant Siting"
- advice and demographic criteria that waste facility proponents should use when making their selection of a Waste-to-Energy site that will tend to offer the least amount of political resistance and local public opposition to the project.
Soumis le 28 mars 2024 8:06 AM
Commentaire sur
Proposition de désignation, en vertu de la Loi sur les évaluations environnementales, du site d’enfouissement et de l’expansion du transfert et du traitement des déchets, situés dans la municipalité de Chatham Kent
Numéro du REO
019-8417
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
97611
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire