I'm opposed to Ontario Bill…

I'm opposed to Ontario Bill 212 (Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024) for several key reasons. The proposal to eliminate bike lanes to reduce traffic congestion is flawed and lacks evidence. In fact, removing bike lanes won't decrease traffic; studies and historical data show the opposite. This action is likely to lead to more accidents and fatalities, ultimately increasing costs in healthcare, emergency services, and legal expenses.

Historical data from Toronto illustrates this issue clearly. When bike lanes were removed from Jarvis Street in 2011, the city's own data showed that travel times increased and traffic slowed, contradicting the goal of reducing congestion. Removing bike lanes endangers cyclists and discourages sustainable transportation options, increasing reliance on cars and worsening gridlock.

Instead of enacting policies that jeopardize lives and degrade urban infrastructure, the province should focus on investments that directly benefit residents, such as improving healthcare and education. This approach would better serve the long-term interests of Ontarians than dismantling bike lanes to appease drivers and suburban commuters.

In summary, Bill 212 is a step backward for Toronto and the province. Sustainable urban planning should prioritize multimodal transportation solutions that promote safety, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. The government should aim to create a livable, accessible city for everyone, not just those who drive into the city for work.