Commentaire
While the proposed 10% variance to property setbacks may streamline minor adjustments, Perth County Council believes that broad application of this policy across all setbacks could compromise compatibility with adjacent land uses. We recommend delegating approval authority for minor variance requests to chief planners, ensuring that adjustments align with local planning frameworks while reducing the need and timelines for formal Committee of Adjustment applications.
A broader concern is the transparency and consultation process surrounding Bill 17. By shifting legislative details to future regulations, the Province risks diminishing public engagement and municipal input. We strongly urge the Province to commit to early consultations and engagement with municipalities on all proposed regulations to ensure a coordinated approach to future growth.
Finally, the limited public consultation period for Bill 17 is insufficient for municipalities to conduct thorough reviews and assessments. A 30-day period or less does not allow adequate time for staff analysis, Council review, and formal responses. We respectfully request that future legislative changes provide longer review periods to facilitate informed municipal participation.
The Perth County Council asks the Province to consider our concerns and engage meaningfully with our municipalities to ensure that future legislative changes and regulations support responsible growth and municipal sustainability. We welcome the opportunity to discuss these matters further and seek constructive solutions that benefit both municipal governments and provincial planning objectives.
Soumis le 6 juin 2025 1:47 PM
Commentaire sur
Règlement proposé – Variations de plein droit par rapport aux exigences de marge de recul
Numéro du REO
025-0463
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
149570
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire