Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73273

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On behalf of the Nobleton Landowners Group (NLG), who collectively own approximately 80 ha of land situated within the Nobleton Settlement Area in the Township of King, thank you for undertaking this important work to review and revise the Growth Plan and the Provincial Policy Statement to build mor Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74132

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Our family is strongly against any proposals in any Ontario government policy directive that weakens, diminishes, circumvents, substitutes or overrides: 1. Ontario Wetland Evaluation System as it currently exists. 2. Municipalities ability to rule on individual landowners development plans. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74139

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 and its policies are ill advised, poorly constructed, and will only serve to impoverish our province and make the term "Conservative" ironic and infamous. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74374

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not supportive of Bill 23, as both a private citizen of Ontario and an environmental professional. This bill and the many policy changes proposed within it pose great threats to Ontario's natural environment by weakening environmental protections. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74575

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

On the surface, the review of the provincial policy statement and A Place to Grow seem to be needed steps that keep the best interests of Ontarians in mind. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74948

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are some good parts to this such as the intensification of development along transit corridors and trying to simplify procedures and make them easier to deal with. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75140

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The City of Guelph has already made plans for growth. This policy review (019-6177) ignores that work, work which consumed time, resources and engaged buy-in locally. To now conduct this review of the Place To Grow and Provincial Policy is a waste of that time, effort and money. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

75981

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposal to integrate a streamed lined land use policy instrument will only work if there remains a commitment to prevent expansion of urban services and housing beyond current urban boundaries. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76338

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brampton

Statut du commentaire

To Whom It May Concern, The City of Brampton appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the proposed changes outlined through the Environmental Registry Ontario posting regarding the Review of a Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement and Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan. In Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

76451

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not believe enough study has been done to identify the true environmental, Social, Governance or other impacts of this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

77857

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the provisions in Bill 23 that: • Takes away land use planning powers from municipalities • Takes away needed development charge revenue from municipalities resulting in increased taxes for ordinary taxpayers Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79150

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Speeding kills. Approving development proposals at a faster rate will also have long-lasting negative impacts for Ontario. We rely on the Greenbelt for food, clean water and air, recreation, culture, and more. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80441

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Brantford

Statut du commentaire

City of Brantford Planning and Development Services Staff will continue to monitor the creation of a combined document that will address existing overlap and outdated content within the PPS and Growth Plan. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80534

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

With all due respect, my family and I stand with the City of Ottawa (as well as, with leading environmental, community and social justice organizations from across Ottawa) in REJECTING Bill 23 because Bill 23 raises a number of environmental concerns, including jeopardizing the protection of habitat Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

80551

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a home owner of a 98 acre property located in Southern Ontario deemed PSW I'd like to add my comments for consideration, please. My partner and I sought permission to rebuild an accessory structure recessing it 7 meters farther away from its original foundation with a slightly larger footprint. Lire davantage