Comment
I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 212, which proposes a framework for bike lanes that require the removal of existing traffic lanes. This bill not only risks wasting taxpayer dollars by potentially removing already established bike lanes, but it also adds unnecessary red tape to municipal projects that are vital for maintaining efficient traffic flow and safety.
The requirement for provincial approval to implement new bike lanes creates a bureaucratic hurdle that could delay critical infrastructure projects. Instead of expediting solutions to alleviate traffic congestion, this bill could hinder progress and lead to longer wait times for necessary improvements.
Furthermore, this proposal contradicts extensive studies and empirical evidence that demonstrate bike lanes can actually reduce traffic congestion by encouraging cycling and decreasing reliance on motor vehicles. By undermining existing bike lanes and imposing additional regulations, the government is disregarding the proven benefits of promoting sustainable transportation.
In summary, Bill 212 not only risks wasting public funds on the removal of effective infrastructure but also introduces red tape that could further complicate and delay essential projects. I urge you to reconsider this bill and prioritize evidence-based strategies that truly address the issue of gridlock in Ontario.
Submitted October 23, 2024 4:21 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
103263
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status