To whom it may concern, I am…

To whom it may concern,

I am a city planner by profession and would like to submit my comments and knowledge regarding this proposed Bill.

The proposal flies in the face of established best practice for reducing gridlock. Furthermore, it is counter to the well established understanding that any interventions to increase car lanes has an adverse effect on vehicle travel times.

The bill lacks any type of consultation and research with experts on this topic and it shows. If the ministers would like to improve traffic flow for all, an initiative I full support, I would seriously caution against supporting this bill as it currently stands.

From a best-practice and backed research perspective, the reallocation of road space to accurately reflect actual usage: bike users, drivers, and pedestrians, has a positive effect on ALL users. By removing bike lanes from roads, this bill will force cyclists to merge with vehicles thereby slowing down car drivers, and increasing the risk of serious conflict and collision.

Moreover, ministers need only look at any other country or even province for that matter that is tackling the issue of traffic. Look to Vancouver or look to Montreal. Measurable successes are clearly shown in these cities where bike lane introduction has reduced traffic times for all (yes that includes drivers).

I do not support this bill. I do not support the proposed forcing of cyclists back into lanes with vehicles. As a driver and a planner, the road is safer for everyone, more pleasant to drive on when best-practice separation of space is taken into account.

On a more personal note, the current government ministers should have a long look at their motivations behind the implementation of this bill as it displays a shocking lack of regard for any actual proven measures at improving the quality of life for road users.