Comment
No to Bill 212. Here's why:
1. Economic Impact on Small Businesses: The lack of investment for cycling infrastructure as part of Bill 212 is short-sighted and undermines Ontario’s commitment to supporting small businesses. Encouraging more cycling would boost local businesses, as cyclists tend to shop locally and more frequently. Neglecting this investment means lost opportunities for growth and a missed chance to strengthen local economies.
2. Increased Strain on Existing Infrastructure: By discouraging the expansion of bike lanes through Bill 212, we are effectively placing more strain on an already overburdened transportation network. Fewer bike lanes mean more cars, more traffic congestion, and longer commute times, exacerbating the very gridlock the bill claims to address. Investing in comprehensive cycling infrastructure would relieve pressure on roadways and public transportation systems.
3. Disregard for the Climate Crisis: Bill 212's neglect of proper cycling infrastructure is a blatant disregard for Ontario’s role in addressing the climate crisis. Promoting car-centric transportation policies directly conflicts with the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Expanding bike lanes would offer a sustainable, low-emission alternative that aligns with our climate goals and improves the quality of life for all Ontarians.
Submitted October 24, 2024 3:27 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
105147
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status