Comment
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the provincial encroachment on local decision-making related to bike lanes. As a 100% driver who does not bike, I still recognize the importance of maintaining and expanding bike lane infrastructure for the benefit of our communities.
It is crucial that cities like Kingston and Toronto retain the autonomy to determine their own infrastructure needs, particularly when it comes to promoting cycling. Allowing the Mayor of Ontario to dictate whether cities can install or maintain bike lanes undermines local governance and disregards the voices of residents who rely on these critical transportation options.
Moreover, removing bike lanes will not reduce traffic congestion; instead, it will likely exacerbate the issue. Cyclists will be forced to share car lanes, increasing the risk of accidents and discouraging cycling altogether. True traffic reduction can only be achieved by enhancing public transport and encouraging walking and cycling, not by prioritizing car accessibility.
Many cities have invested significant resources in bike lane infrastructure, such as the recently completed lanes on University Avenue in Toronto. To dismantle these improvements is not only a gross misuse of public funds but also a disservice to the community. As a concerned Ontarian, I believe these funds should be redirected to essential services like education and healthcare, rather than wasted on reversing progress in sustainable transportation.
I urge the Environmental Registry to support local decision-making and prioritize the health and safety of our communities.
Thank you for considering my views.
Submitted October 24, 2024 3:53 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
105220
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status