Comment
- I thought the government of Ontario was aiming to reduce bureaucracy. Why is it adding a layer of bureaucracy to a process that can very well be done at the municipal level?
- The removal of existing lanes is a step backwards, and a costly one. Transportation infrastructure is part of a network. A bike lane may not be used as frequently as desired because it is not connected to other bike friendly roads and therefore remains hard to access. The data you collect today may increase significantly if a connection is added. We need to strengthen the network, not weaken it.
- The removal of existing land is probably not going to help reach ANY of the objectives of the framework.
- Invest in youth, allow them to ride safely to their jobs, sports activities, school, grandparents. Make them autonomous and support a bright future for ON.
Submitted October 26, 2024 11:04 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
106869
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status