Comment
I strongly oppose the removal of bike lanes for several reasons:
1. **Increased Traffic Congestion**: Bike lanes play a vital role in reducing the number of cars on the road by encouraging cycling. Removing them will likely lead to more vehicles, worsening congestion and commute times for everyone.
2. **Safety Risks**: Bike lanes provide a safer environment for cyclists, significantly reducing the risk of accidents involving cars. Eliminating these lanes increases the likelihood of collisions, putting both cyclists and drivers at greater risk.
3. **Environmental Impact**: Promoting cycling is essential for sustainability and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Removing bike lanes undermines these environmental goals and could lead to higher carbon footprints due to increased vehicle usage.
4. **Public Health Concerns**: Bike lanes encourage physical activity and healthier lifestyles. Their removal discourages cycling, potentially leading to higher rates of health issues associated with sedentary living.
5. **Community Well-being**: Bike lanes enhance urban livability and make cities more accessible. Removing them detracts from the quality of life for residents who rely on biking as a practical mode of transport.
In summary, I am against this proposal to remove bike lanes, as it undermines safety, health, and environmental sustainability while contributing to increased traffic congestion. It’s essential to prioritize and expand cycling infrastructure for the benefit of all residents.
Submitted October 31, 2024 3:54 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
108184
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status