Comment
Extensive research shows that protected bike infrastructure consistently saves lives. Studies from Toronto, Vancouver, and numerous international cities demonstrate that bike lanes also boost local business revenue, with increases of 15-30% commonly reported as cyclists make more frequent stops at shops.
The argument about traffic delays deserves perspective: studies show that properly designed bike lanes typically add only 1-3 minutes to vehicle commute times. We must ask ourselves: is saving a minute or two worth sacrificing both public safety and economic benefits?
Moreover, the funds used for removing bike lanes could be better spent on improving public transit service. Enhanced transit funding would give residents more transportation choices, reduce congestion, and create a more efficient transportation network for everyone. Rather than spending money to remove infrastructure that makes our streets safer, let's invest those resources in expanding transit service and frequency.
The data clearly shows that bike lanes and robust public transit create more livable, prosperous, and safe communities for everyone. This isn't about cyclists versus drivers - it's about building a transportation system that works for all Ontarians.
I strongly urge you to maintain and expand our bike lane network, not remove it. This is an evidence-based investment in Ontario's future.
Submitted October 31, 2024 8:03 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
108352
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status