Comment
I recommend this government read literally any reports on bike lanes before repeating their blatantly false statements as if they're fact.
Here is a link to a good report that could bring some light to the matter: https://tcat.ca/resources/bloor-street-economic-impact-studies/
To summarize, the research found that after Bloor's pilot bike lane was installed:
More businesses reported having >100 customers per day (46% pre vs. 62% post)
There was growth in visitors who spent $100 or more per month (44% pre vs. 53% post)
77% of cyclists perceived biking on Bloor as safe, compared to just 9% previously
If this were a "common sense approach" then it would consider:
the 6 deaths that have occurred in the City of Toronto this year, not to mention the severe and life altering injuries
the cost to remove bike lanes that were just installed and finished the last few years
the fact that making room for more cars means there are more cars to create gridlock
Finally, if this were a plan to make "our roads accessible for everyone" then why is the plan just for cars?
If this government could address any of the above that would be greatly appreciated because so far all I've heard is political talking points with zero evidence and zero reasoning.
Supporting links
Submitted October 31, 2024 8:38 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
108447
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status