Commentaire
I recommend this government read literally any reports on bike lanes before repeating their blatantly false statements as if they're fact.
Here is a link to a good report that could bring some light to the matter: https://tcat.ca/resources/bloor-street-economic-impact-studies/
To summarize, the research found that after Bloor's pilot bike lane was installed:
More businesses reported having >100 customers per day (46% pre vs. 62% post)
There was growth in visitors who spent $100 or more per month (44% pre vs. 53% post)
77% of cyclists perceived biking on Bloor as safe, compared to just 9% previously
If this were a "common sense approach" then it would consider:
the 6 deaths that have occurred in the City of Toronto this year, not to mention the severe and life altering injuries
the cost to remove bike lanes that were just installed and finished the last few years
the fact that making room for more cars means there are more cars to create gridlock
Finally, if this were a plan to make "our roads accessible for everyone" then why is the plan just for cars?
If this government could address any of the above that would be greatly appreciated because so far all I've heard is political talking points with zero evidence and zero reasoning.
Liens connexes
Soumis le 31 octobre 2024 8:38 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
108447
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire