Comment
I completely agree with this. The decision-makers at Toronto City Hall need more oversight. Many people are losing valuable family time due to policies that seem to cater to a specific agenda.
The focus on accommodating a small number of bicycle commuters has led to the removal of parking spaces and reduced road access for those living outside the city center. This policy appears to be highly detrimental, offering minimal benefits to the majority of taxpayers.
It’s likely that a vast majority of the population, around 98%, only use bicycles occasionally during pleasant weather. Additionally, about 75% of the city’s residents may not be physically fit enough to use bicycles regularly. As a result, these policies have significantly increased commute times for suburban residents.
The often crazy limitations placed on arterial roads have had many seriously detrimental effects.
Extended Delivery Times: The congestion can lead to longer delivery times, requiring more trucks and drivers to maintain the same level of service. This increases operational costs for businesses.
Higher Costs: The additional expenses from extended delivery times and increased fuel consumption c inflates the cost of goods, impacting both businesses and consumers
Increased Pollution: More vehicles on the road for longer periods contribute to higher emissions, worsening air quality and potentially leading to health-related costs1.
Reduced Customer Access: Limited parking and increased traffic can deter customers from visiting certain areas, negatively affecting local businesses
These factors highlight the need for a balanced approach to urban planning that considers the diverse needs of all city residents and businesses. None of this has been considered by the current and past councils.
Submitted November 1, 2024 12:27 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
109723
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status