Comment
Removing bike lanes in favor of additional traffic lanes has several negative consequences:
Safety Concerns: Bike lanes are designed to protect cyclists from vehicle traffic, reducing the likelihood of accidents. Eliminating these lanes can increase the risk of collisions, making the streets less safe for cyclists and pedestrians.
Traffic Congestion: Adding more lanes for vehicles often doesn't solve congestion problems. Studies show that increasing road capacity can lead to more cars on the road, as it encourages additional driving, ultimately worsening traffic.
Environmental Impact: Promoting car use over cycling can lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Prioritizing bike lanes supports sustainable transportation options that reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
Health Benefits: Cycling is a healthy mode of transportation that encourages physical activity. Removing bike lanes can discourage cycling, leading to decreased public health benefits associated with regular exercise.
Urban Livability: Cities that prioritize bike lanes tend to be more livable, with less noise and air pollution, and more vibrant street life. Removing these lanes can detract from the overall quality of urban environments.
This bill doesn't make any sense, please don't make this mistake.
Submitted November 2, 2024 1:16 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
111026
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status