I strongly oppose this bill…

I strongly oppose this bill. Car-centric mentalities towards transport are actively hostile to public transit, bike riders, and pedestrians. I think its important to provide and maintain infrastructure that makes navigating our roads safer and more accessible to everybody, especially people who don't use cars for transport. I would encourage the city in fact to approve more bike lanes moving forwards, and am confused why this bill proposes to destroy existing infrastructure. Why? It would cost the city more. Why the focus on this rather than building more accessibility - such as connecting bike paths, which also encourage tourism? Or making roads safer for riders, and pedestrians? Or making the city easier to navigate via wheelchair or mobility aid? This is a backwards step, and both a waste of peoples time, and tax payers money should it go ahead. Please reconsider.