To Whom It May Concern, I…

To Whom It May Concern,

I would like to express my strong opposition to the proposal outlined in Bill 212 regarding the removal of bicycle lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue. I would like to outline several points to consider:

- Utilization of Bicycle Lanes: Much of the debate hinges on the assumption that the newly installed bicycle lanes are underutilized, leading to the conclusion that they occupy valuable space needed for motor vehicle traffic. However, this perspective overlooks a critical factor: the connectivity of the cycling network. The new stretches of bicycle lanes often lack sufficient connections to other routes, which diminishes their usage compared to better-integrated lanes in the downtown core. A more connected network would likely enhance accessibility and encourage greater cycling participation.

- Temporary Relief and Long-term Consequences: While returning a lane to motor vehicle traffic may offer immediate relief, this effect is likely to be short-lived. By prioritizing cars over alternative modes of transportation, we risk creating a cycle of increased demand for car travel, leading to inevitable gridlock once again. Every bicycle utilizing a designated lane represents one less car on the road, contributing to a more efficient overall transportation system.

- Development Stage of Bicycle Infrastructure: It’s important to recognize that Toronto's bicycle infrastructure is still evolving. Enhanced cycling facilities have been shown to stimulate demand for bike trips, as evidenced by the record ridership numbers reported by the BikeShare program this year. There is an unrealistic expectation among some car-reliant citizens for an instantaneous shift in transportation habits, overlooking the natural lag that occurs as preferences change. Developing a robust cycling infrastructure takes time and investment, but the results will lead to increased cycling adoption.

- Rising Demand for Cycling Infrastructure: The demand for cycling infrastructure in Toronto is on the rise, reflecting a growing awareness of the benefits of alternative transportation. Reversing the progress made with the current bicycle lanes would not only set back the city’s efforts to promote non-car modes of travel, but it would also necessitate a costly reinvestment in these infrastructures in the future. Evidence from countries with similar cold climates, such as Denmark, demonstrates that a well-developed cycling network can become a primary mode of transportation. Closer to home, Montreal’s success in enhancing and connecting its cycling infrastructure has led to a notable reduction in car congestion, particularly for trips that cannot be easily served by other means.

In conclusion, I urge the Transportation Ministry to consider the long-term benefits of maintaining and improving our cycling infrastructure. This investment goes beyond merely creating bike lanes; it is about fostering a more sustainable, efficient, and connected transportation network for all Toronto residents. Ultimately, enhancing cycling infrastructure will also benefit car-reliant residents by alleviating congestion and improving overall traffic flow in the city.

I recognize that in some cases, the introduction of new cycling lanes has led to the removal of a lane for motor vehicles, contributing to gridlock. In these instances, it would be beneficial to explore alternative cycling infrastructure options—such as creating dedicated space for cyclists on the sidewalk, effectively separating them from both pedestrians and cars, while returning the lane to motor vehicle traffic. On very narrow roads, this could be a win-win situation for everyone. This approach has proven successful in many major European cities (for example, Berlin) and could serve as a viable solution for Toronto.

However, dismantling parts of the cycling routes on these major roads could cause irreparable damage to the overall cycling network in the city. A cohesive and well-connected cycling infrastructure is essential for encouraging cycling as a viable transportation option and ensuring the continued progress toward a more sustainable urban environment.