Comment
I am reaching out to express my concern over the proposed legislative direction that prioritizes drivers, especially with the potential removal of dedicated bicycle lanes. As a resident of Toronto and a professional in the field urban design, I am passionate about building cities that prioritize people and sustainable urban growth. I believe removing bike lanes is a significant step backward for our city.
Bicycle lanes, particularly protected ones, serve as essential infrastructure for urban mobility. They enable more efficient movement of people within our limited urban space, encourage healthier, active lifestyles, and relieve some pressure from our already strained healthcare system. By supporting safe cycling, we can reduce the need for cars, create more vibrant, pedestrian-friendly communities, and support higher density, which is crucial in addressing our housing crisis.
Improved public transit remains essential for Toronto’s growth and livability. With projects like the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Finch West LRT, Toronto has tremendous potential to shift away from car dependency. However, these projects have faced significant delays, limiting their benefit to the public. I urge you to advocate for accelerated timelines and greater transparency in these critical transit projects, so they can fulfill their role in moving people across our city effectively.
I believe we need a renewed focus on urban mobility that recognizes cities as places for people first. Infrastructure decisions should prioritize the needs of cyclists, pedestrians, and transit users to foster a more sustainable and resilient Toronto.
Submitted November 4, 2024 10:44 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
112568
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status