Comment
I strongly disagree with the proposed Bill 212.
The addition of designated bike lanes in Toronto has been a wonderful change to the city. I've witnessed the flow of bike traffic on a bike lane during morning rush hour and was impressed with how many cyclists were making use of the lane for commuting. Consider all the cars that have been removed from the roads because these people chose to bike to work instead! This must make a significant positive impact on pollution and congestion in the city. And don't forget the health benefits to the people cycling.
In addition, granting the provincial government "exemption from the Environmental Assessment Act" is total nonsense. The province is suggesting sweeping changes to tear out existing bike lanes without making any assessments on the benefits of the bike lanes.
Personally, when I can, I choose to cycle to get to nearby destinations for running errands and going to appointments. Often, for the places I'm going, cycling is as fast as driving, and faster than transit. Removing the bike lanes would make the roads more dangerous for cyclists and would cause more congestion when those who deem the roads too dangerous for cycling, opt for driving.
Transportation in the province should not be prioritizing cars and driving. There should be more focus on less polluting options and improving public transit. Instead of wasting time and resources on removing bike lanes, why doesn't the provincial government and Ministry of Transportation focus on opening the VERY long delayed Metrolinx transit lines in Toronto, like the Eglinton Crosstown?
Submitted November 4, 2024 3:52 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
112787
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status