This is a poorly conceived…

This is a poorly conceived Bill, on a number of fronts.

First, it is over-reach by a higher level of government into the affairs of the most local level. Municipal governments are best suited to understand and respond to the transportation of the needs of their citizens within a city.

Second, it runs contrary to all evidence. The most effective way to combat gridlock is not to add car lanes or remove bike lanes, thereby pushing people to drive more often. This only exacerbates the problems. What works all over the world, and yes, in Ontario, is to offer safe, efficient and attractive alternatives to the motor vehicle. By giving those who CAN take a bicycle for some of their trips the ability to do so in greater safety, more people will choose to take such trips more often.

Third, this is the most economically inefficient way to move people. Building and maintaining lanes for motor vehicle use is a poor use of taxpayer dollars and of scarce space in dense cities, when walking, cycling and transit are far more efficient.

Fourth, it is based on the assumption that most people have access to a motor vehicle, can afford to own and operate one and pay for parking, and that they wish to use a car as opposed to a mode that offers greater freedom, fitness and flexibility.

All over the world, cities are shifting to prioritizing the use of the bicycle for more trips, and are saving money, freeing up space and reducing congestion. Restricting the construction of bicycle lanes or, worse, eliminating ones that have already been built at great cost and with strong community support is simply short-sighted and an example of big government imposing its will on the citizen.

I thank you for considering my evidence-based comments. I have researched this issue all over the world. produced a documentary film on the topic (Bike City, Great City) and served eight years on City Council in Ottawa where the overwhelming majority of citizens and voters support more bike lanes.