Comment
I oppose the bill for the following reasons:
- This bill does not take into consideration of the safety of cyclists. Networks are established to provide safety for the cyclist and provide access to shops and amenities throughout city corridors. Research shows that it increases foot traffic to downtown shops when proper cycling infrastructure is in place.
- It should not be the provinces decision to interfere with municipal matters. The infrastructure was established after public consultation and studies in the area. Removing the bike lanes does for one is a colossal waste of money but it will not help with the grid lock in Toronto and other cities. Adding more lanes will just cause more traffic (induced demand). The focus should be for better public transportation to reduce the reliance on vehicles and investment into public projects (i.e. subways, high frequency trains, bike paths, etc)
- Cyclists should have there own bike lane to prevent irritation to drivers but also for speed, mobility, and general safety. If the option of safe cycling infrastructure is established, people will use it. This is displayed in countless countries even with cold climates.
Submitted November 4, 2024 8:43 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
112953
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status