Comment
This seems extremely silly and short sighted. How does removing and preventing lanes help grid lock when it means that anyone who uses bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc will now just be sharing the same lanes as regular vehicles? How does having a car that is able to go 50Km stuck behind a cyclist who may not be able to reach those speeds prevent grid lock? Would this not simply introduce more gridlock and issues? If you want to reduce gridlock then investing into good and reliable public transportation is the best way: incentivize people to not be driving individual vehicle but instead use a bus or car pool. 1 person = 1 car vs 2 people = 1 car sure seems like that means there would only be half the current amount of cars on the road, greatly reducing congestion.
Submitted November 6, 2024 10:11 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
113576
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status