Comment
I am strongly opposed to Bill 212. As a daily cyclist and a Toronto resident, I rely on bike lanes to commute safely and efficiently. Cycling isn't just a personal choice for me—it’s part of my commitment to reducing congestion and pollution, and making the city more livable for everyone. By removing bike lanes, the bill would force cyclists like myself onto already crowded streets, significantly increasing the risk of accidents and safety hazards.
This move could also push people who rely on bikes as a sustainable transportation option back into cars, contributing to even more traffic and emissions, which is exactly what we should be trying to avoid. Bike lanes on streets like Bloor-Danforth have proven to be critical for safe and efficient commuting. These lanes are not just a convenience—they’re a lifeline for many of us, particularly those who don't have the option of driving.
Instead of rolling back vital cycling infrastructure, the Ontario government should be investing in more bike lanes and improving the existing ones to support a healthier, greener, and less congested city. Cycling is an essential part of the solution to Toronto’s growing congestion and climate crisis. I urge the government to reconsider this bill and prioritize the safety and well-being of cyclists and all commuters in our city.
Or maybe we can just open the Eglinton & Finch LRT already?
Submitted November 13, 2024 1:01 AM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
115209
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status