Comment
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed framework that would enable provincial approval for the removal of bike lanes, including those on Bloor St., Yonge St., and University Ave. in Toronto.
Bike Lanes Save Lives:
Bike lanes provide a safer environment for cyclists, reducing the risk of accidents and fatalities on busy streets. Removing these lanes would endanger the lives of thousands of cyclists who rely on this infrastructure to commute safely.
Environmental Benefits:
Bike lanes are a crucial step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions. By encouraging more people to choose cycling over driving, they help cities meet climate goals and create a more sustainable future. Removing bike lanes runs counter to these efforts and would increase reliance on cars, leading to higher emissions and poorer air quality.
Health Benefits:
Cycling is a great way to promote public health by encouraging physical activity. Bike lanes make cycling a more accessible and attractive option, reducing the burden on our healthcare system by fostering healthier lifestyles.
Traffic Congestion:
Contrary to misconceptions, bike lanes reduce traffic congestion by providing an alternative mode of transportation, alleviating pressure on roads and public transit systems. Cities worldwide have shown that investing in bike infrastructure leads to fewer cars on the road and smoother traffic flow. Removing these lanes would likely result in more cars and gridlock.
Boosting Local Businesses:
Studies have shown that bike-friendly streets boost local businesses, as cyclists are more likely to stop and shop compared to drivers. The removal of bike lanes would harm small businesses that benefit from the increased foot traffic.
Waste of Taxpayers' Money:
Significant public funds were invested in creating these bike lanes. Removing them not only wastes this investment but also incurs additional costs to revert the streets back, with no clear long-term benefit. This is an irresponsible use of taxpayers' money.
Global Precedents and Leadership:
Cities around the world, including Amsterdam, Copenhagen, and New York, are investing in bike infrastructure because of its proven benefits. Ontario should be a leader in promoting sustainable urban development rather than taking a regressive step that undermines safety, health, and economic growth.
In summary, this proposal is short-sighted and counterproductive. Instead of removing bike lanes, the focus should be on expanding them to create a safer, healthier, and more sustainable Ontario. I urge the government to reconsider this proposal and prioritize the well-being of its citizens and the environment.
Submitted November 19, 2024 4:33 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
118017
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status