I am writing to express my…

I am writing to express my deep concerns about Bill 212, which, if enacted, would require municipalities to seek provincial approval for adding new bike lanes that involve removing existing car lanes. While I understand the importance of maintaining traffic flow and addressing congestion, this legislation risks undermining the safety, environmental sustainability, and economic vibrancy of our communities.

Bike Lanes Save Lives
Studies consistently show that bike lanes reduce traffic-related fatalities and injuries for both cyclists and motorists. A 2019 study published in The Journal of Transport and Health found that cities with more bike lanes experienced lower rates of traffic fatalities overall, as they encourage safer driver behavior and provide dedicated spaces for cyclists. Moreover, data from New York City revealed a 40% reduction in fatalities on streets with protected bike lanes.

By restricting the ability of cities to expand cycling infrastructure, Bill 212 could inadvertently increase risks for vulnerable road users, especially as cycling grows in popularity as a mode of transportation.

Bike Lanes Do Not Cause Congestion
The argument that bike lanes lead to increased traffic congestion is not supported by research. A 2021 study from McGill University showed that bike lanes, especially those separated from car traffic, can improve overall traffic flow by reducing conflict points between vehicles and cyclists. Similarly, cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam, which prioritize cycling infrastructure, report less congestion compared to car-dominated urban areas.

Instead of framing the issue as “cars versus bikes,” we should focus on building transportation systems that work for everyone. By providing safe and efficient options for all modes of travel—whether driving, cycling, or walking—we can foster a more connected and functional urban environment.

Investing in Better Cities
Bike lanes are not just about transportation; they contribute to healthier, more sustainable communities. Studies have shown that areas with robust cycling infrastructure see increased economic activity, as cyclists tend to stop more frequently at local businesses compared to car drivers. Additionally, encouraging active transportation reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supports public health, and alleviates financial burdens on families who might otherwise depend on multiple vehicles.

Restricting bike lane development may hinder progress toward these goals, especially in cities with growing populations and diverse transportation needs. We should empower municipalities to make the decisions that best suit their local contexts, rather than impose blanket policies that may stifle innovation and progress.

A Collaborative Solution
I urge you to reconsider the provisions of Bill 212 that limit municipal autonomy and the expansion of active transportation options. Instead, we should focus on policies that encourage collaboration between the province and cities to build safer, greener, and more economically resilient communities.