A common talking point in…

A common talking point in the debate around traffic in the GTA is that of induced demand: the fact that creating additional lanes for vehicles actually generates more demand, and does not reduce traffic. Thus, ripping up bike lanes for cars will not support Ontario's stated objective of fighting gridlock. However, the concept of induced demand also holds true for bike lanes, and again, the evidence backs this up - "build it and they will come". However, this option does help to move cars off the road. If the province wanted to reduce congestion in urban areas, the data-based decision would actually be to build more bike lanes. As the current proposal would do the opposite, it seems that it is being made for other reasons.

Cycling is both climate-friendly and community-friendly. It dramatically reduces an individual's transportation carbon footprint and supports their physical health. Riding a bike is quieter and is better for air quality in our city streets. Both studies and anecdotal reporting from small businesses have shown that cyclists are more likely to stop and shop, contributing to the local economy.

This proposal represents an overreach into what should be a municipal decision, as municipal politicians across the province have repeatedly highlighted. Instead, the shared goal for the Province and the City should be to firmly establish Toronto as a world-class city. These cities are characterized not by more lanes for vehicle traffic, but rather by efficient, frequent, reliable public transit, and robust cycling infrastructure. Having lived in both Montreal and Copenhagen, it is clear that a city built for bikes is a city built for success.