No. This goes against…

No. This goes against everything we collectively know about traffic flow efficiencies, public road and transit cost efficiencies, what we need for safety for all road users, and the many benefits of bikes for health, social connection, nature connection, and community safety. And we need bike lanes for our survival. 1.5C of warming is all but lost. We need every single bike trip we can get at this point. So completely counter productive it would take me all night to actually write it out. It goes against the bodies of research of probably a large university campus- worth of researchers, scientists and academics from disciplines such as exercise physiology, community development, psychology, planning, transportation management, landscape architecture, health sciences, economics, political economy, sociology and more. What actually are you trying to accomplish with this, besides increase power and control over municipalities, and make them less equitable, safe and climate-ready/responsive? No.