Comment
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to Bill 212 due to its implications for road safety and environmental sustainability.
Firstly, Bill 212 raises serious road safety concerns. Prohibiting the installation of new bike lanes if motor vehicle lanes are removed, and removing heavily used bike lanes that provide viable commuting options for urban residents will have minimal impact on gridlock, but it will make roads less safe for all users, and will deter people from choosing more sustainable modes of transportation that would reduce congestion. Supporting safe infrastructure such as bike lines should be a priority, and any policy that risks increasing accidents or injuries is unacceptable.
Additionally, the environmental implications of Bill 212 are deeply worrying. By exempting the proposed Highway 413 from the Greenbelt Plan and the Environmental Assessment Act, irrevocable damage will be done to local ecosystems and habitats, and the Green Belt as a whole, jeopardizing the health and well-being of future generations.
As a parent, I want to see policies that improve safety, protect the environment and support sustainability for our children and future generations.
I urge the provincial government to reconsider Bill 212 and engage in meaningful consultation with municipalities, environmental experts, and community members. Ontario needs policies that prioritize safety, sustainability, and local input to build a better future for all residents.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Submitted November 20, 2024 11:37 PM
Comment on
Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 - Framework for bike lanes that require removal of a traffic lane.
ERO number
019-9266
Comment ID
121935
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status