This proposal ignores how…

This proposal ignores how systems function. Therefore, I am opposed to the way this proposal assumes a centralized operations scheme can manage local water systems.

Water systems are integrated locally through inter-connection of wetlands, springs, runoff , creeks, rivers, ponds and lakes. Rural properties depend on wells, so the moraines are also part of the water system that must be considered when thinking about how the mandate and operating parameters of Conservation Authorities will be implemented.

To understand a system takes copious amounts of rigorous local observation measured in decades.

Reimagining the administrative structure to be more efficient by merging current conservation areas into a mere 7 ignores the wealth of localized observations necessary to keep an updated understanding the water systems (note the contributing system components above - all interconnected - changing one affects all others) within a watershed. Amalgamating watersheds may make administrative sense, but totally ignores how nature operates.

The Grand River Watershed is one example of a system depending upon and needing highly localized observation due to the heavy dependence on ground sourced potable water for all the farming, industrial and residential uses of potable water.

Flooding is a highly localized event depending on multiple factors and demanding local responses. A centralized authority cannot deliver localized and timely response nor undertake the level of oversight and observation required to ensure operators are actual following the requirements and proper use of their water-taking permits.

Without local authoritative oversight our potable water sources are jeopardized. Centralization of decision making for the currently existing Conservation Authorities jeopardizes the Health and Safety of Ontario Industry and citizenry.