Conservation authorities…

ERO number

025-1257

Comment ID

177522

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

Conservation authorities were established in direct response to flooding and erosion, and their value is evident. Decision-makers recognized early on that conservation authorities should be rooted in the regions they serve. They should be staffed and governed by individuals who understand the local watersheds, history, and needs.

Ontario’s conservation authority model, which is unique in Canada, has enabled sustainable growth while protecting the natural systems that we rely on, including drinking water sources, trails, shoreline access, and wildlife habitat.

This proposal could diminish local decision-making authority, risking a disconnect from community-specific needs and priorities. Coupled with years of mandated reductions, diminished resources, and decreased independence, this change risks sidelining local expertise.

These changes would not only leave communities more vulnerable to climate-driven risks but would also directly impact my work in water resources engineering. I have worked closely with most conservation authorities across Ontario, and their data, models, technical reviews, and policy expertise are vital for designing effective stormwater systems, bridge replacements, and flood mitigation for municipal, private, and MTO projects. Without local involvement, these projects would take longer, slowing improvements and development across the province.

I respectfully urge you not to proceed with this consolidation. Instead, please work collaboratively with Indigenous communities, municipalities, and civil society to empower conservation authorities to effectively utilize their deep, place-based knowledge.

Strengthening local expertise is essential for our collective flood resilience, water safety, and natural area conservation.