This is just another example…

This is just another example of grouping together "good sounding" changes in order to pass really bad changes to regulations that protect people and the environment.
Changes involving such a different array of areas of society should be rejected and only allow policy changes proposal for very specific aspects.
The person driving this changes is an oligarch following with the "Globalisation" agenda that has already destroyed countless regions of the world. At the end, the only beneficiaries are a few multinational corporations that belong to the same group of people.
At the end they only care about increasing their profits regardless of what happens to people, society, the country and the environment. The globalisation of corporations is just a way to hide profits and minimise taxes; there is no real exports, it is just moving parts from place to place.
The result is that the taxes needed to provide the services these corporations need to operate (security, roads, etc.) are subsidised for them and mainly paid by the common people, while the owners of these corporation hide their profits and avoid paying taxes.
And the "jobs" created by this "open for business" policies are just as disposable as a dirty napkin. Get the cheapest guy either from desperate locals or even more desperate new immigrants through third party agencies, and get rid of them as soon as you can find a cheaper one. Have you analysed what is the average duration of employment nowadays in big companies and multinationals not counting the desperate humans at the bottom?

In summary, I disagree with this changes because:
- many changes of different areas are bounded together to hide the social impact these changes will have.
- many of the proposed changes are really detrimental to the environment.
- it will reduce the quality of jobs in Ontario and it will lower real wages and safety to employees.
- it does not benefit Canada or Canadians
- it will further help the self declare king help his friend and himself get richer by avoiding paying for what they need to operate businesses while transferring the tax burden to the common people.
- there are many examples of the result these types of changes had in other societies like third world countries. Is that where we want to take Canada? Ready history and you will see that this was applied to countries that are now totally destroyed.