Here is a list of the key…

ERO number

011-1300

Comment ID

396

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

Here is a list of the key reasons why Ontario Nature is asking the government to reconsider the proposal to extend the Rondeau cottage leases to 2038.

1. Protected areas are key to conservation and the protection of biodiversity.

As recognized in Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy, introduced by the McGuinty government in 2005, parks and protected areas are one of the cornerstones for biodiversity conservation strategies. In southern Ontario, where less than 4% of the landscape is protected in parks and conservation lands, few opportunities exist for the expansion of protected areas. This means that protected areas are especially critical to the protection of wildlife. Rondeau is renowned for its biodiversity. To the extent possible, its unique vegetation-landform features should be free of human structures and manicured landscaping and restored to a natural state where wild, native species thrive.

2. Maintaining ecological integrity is the guiding management principle for Ontario’s provincial parks. Ontario’s Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act, passed in 2006 under the McGuinty government, enshrined the maintenance of ecological integrity as the first objective and the first guiding principle of park management. Extending the cottage leases would contradict this clear, legislated management priority for the park system in Ontario. Maintaining Rondeau’s ecological integrity is an enormous challenge, given its small size and location within the heavily developed landscape of southern Ontario.

3. The current approved park management plan states that the cottage leases will be terminated in 2017. The current park management plan for Rondeau Park is the result of considerable public consultation regarding the best management direction for the park. The extension of the cottage leases was a highly contentious issue during the preparation of the plan (late 1980s/ early 1990s), and the extension of the cottage leases to 2017 was a huge concession to cottagers at the time and strongly opposed by conservation organizations. Another such concession is unacceptable, especially given the provincial government’s commitments to protecting biodiversity, recovering endangered species and maintaining the ecological integrity of protected areas.

4. The cottages have a negative ecological impact. The cottages in Rondeau, which extend along most of the park’s western shoreline and a portion of the eastern shoreline, are located on some of the most environmentally significant portions of the park. Simply by occupying a good portion of the land base, the cottages impede its use by wildlife. Direct harm to wildlife has also been documented. The recovery strategy for the threatened eastern foxsnake notes, for example, that some cottage owners have admitted to killing foxsnakes. Another negative impact has been the introduction of invasive non-native species, identified as a key threat to various species at risk and rare habitats found within the park. A 2008 survey of the eastern dunes of the park found numerous invasive plant species, many intentionally introduced by cottage leaseholders.

[Original Comment ID: 128942]