INPUT: KEY POINTS OF CONCERN…

INPUT: KEY POINTS OF CONCERN :

* Environmental assessment amendments and carbon pricing amendments are buried further down in schedules and not clearly evident in the summary overview - misleading to the public accessing the ERO
* Proposed referendum to be required to protect against carbon pricing (Schedule 5 in supporting documents)
- directly in opposition to Canada’s Supreme Court ruling that it is the federal government who has jurisdiction on carbon pricing,
- negates Canada’s global target commitment to draw down carbon emissions
80% of carbon pricing goes back to families which contradicts what this provincial government is implying when it says this Act will help improve the cost of living of the average household as the majority of households get more back from the carbon pricing than they pay. The fuel tax cuts at the pump in place until June 2024. While the province says it has saved average Ontario household $260 since 2022, it is these very households that are paying for the fossil fuel tax cut by the 2022 $100 million tax surplus (money that could have gone to clean energy), and not by offending GHG industries
- Carbon pricing has been shown to speed up the transition process to clean energy and cleaner infrastructure, therefore this Act is hindering legislated climate goals
- What are the specifics of the provincial alternative plan, as is federally legislated should carbon pricing not be in place? Premier Ford is yet to show a plan for climate emissions reductions except to say that Ontario will reach Paris Agreement levels by 2030:
- this provincial government cancelled electrical vehicle and energy efficiency retrofit rebates. FIT rebates,
- Future energy plans still include controversial new fossil gas plants and expansions
- Ontario emissions are going up due to this provincial government’s policies on energy production and determination to keep more fossil fuel based vehicles on our highway systems.
- 750 clean energy hydro projects cancelled in 2018 costing taxpayer $231 million
- Premier Ford’s plan is to reduce to 144 megatonnes annually by 2030 which is Paris agreement but not the accelerated level that COP26-28 have expressed and doesn’t factor in the growth in population.
- David Piccini, Environment Minister at the time, said they would continue to build ‘on the green infrastructure that Ontario needs, creating the conditions for clean jobs for future generations and working in partnership with industry to decarbonize.’ How does a referendum on carbon pricing strategies support this?

* Environmental Assessment Act amendments:
- Timelines of assessments for highways and infrastructure are being cut

- Additional lands can be expropriated prior to assessments being completed

* The cost:
- No disclosure yet of the individual costs of highways like the 413 and Bradford Bypass after years of planning; outside estimation is approximately $12 billion. How is this a wise use of taxpayer money when there are viable alternatives that have been ruled out without expert consultation?
- $20 million of taxpayers money spent on political advertising about Ontario ‘ Getting It Done’/ 'It's Happening Here', yet provincial pans do not meet current federal or global climate targets

* Provincial government has only provided municipalities and concerned organizations with 30 days to respond to a legislation amendment proposal that encompasses changes to eight other legislative acts.

INPUT SOLUTIONS:

NO to:
- The 413 and Bradford Bypass:
- Construction and induced demand that increases vehicles on the road
- 17,400,000 tonnes by 2050 in CO2 emissions and environmental consequences; preventing us from meeting climate goals
- Paving over 400 acres of Greenbelt, provincially significant carbon capture wetlands, and 2000 acres of prime farmland
- Short and long term impact on freshwater headlands, systems and wells
- Endangering 29+ federally recognized species at risk
- Starting at: $10 billion (413), $2-4 billion (Bradford Bypass), $2 billion (404 to highway 12) of taxpayer money to benefit select developers
- False claims of ‘travel time saved’; government and independent traffic studies shown this to be grossly inaccurate
- Municipalities having to rely on more development to fund more Go and transit stations (Ontario Minister of Infrastructure bill Sept 25, 2023)

NO to:
- Carbon pricing referendum legislation on a proven method to reduce industrial emissions that also acts as a positive catalyst for a clean energy job economy, and improved financial circumstances for every household
NO to:
- Further erosion of the Environmental Assessment Act whereby procurement/expropriation of land can happen before assessments are completed

No to:
- expropriation of Greenbelt lands for any infrastructure usage

YES to:
- Strengthening the Environmental Assessment Act to prevent the further destruction of our biodiversity, endangered species, carbon sinks, and oxygen producing trees

YES to:
- Improving public transit - stop stalling on transit projects like Innisfil; provide funding the TTC cross-boundary services; keep Metrolinx accountable for services like Kitchener to London

YES to:
- The province publishing health, emissions and traffic reports for the proposed highways

YES to:
- Obtaining UNDRIP, federal Bill C-15 Action Plan of prior and free consent from First Nations for land expropriation

YES to:
- If necessary, buying back 407 as a no toll highway since it already exists; money for 413 and Bypass plus future toll revenue and revenue form saved prime agricultural land and Greenbelt lands would cover cost

YES to
- Reinstating housing retrofit rebates and EV incentives with the carbon pricing tax acquired in 2022 and 2023

YES to:
- Legislation that increases affordable housing density intensification in existing municipal boundaries; forcing private sector and work forces to align themselves to the real needs

YES to:
- Protecting the Greenbelt as promised from all encroachments, including redundant highways when other options exist

YES to:
- An Auditor General investigation into similar inappropriate processes that were used for the lands removed/planned for removal from the Greenbelt for housing development to happen for both the 413 and Bradford Bypass