Commentaire
I am dismayed and discouraged to read about this proposal. My reasons to oppose this are:
1. It will increase red tape for the provincial government, who say they are reducing red tape to get things done.
2. It removes the power of municipalities to make decisions about cycling infrastructure. Municipalities are set up to make informed decisions for their citizens so why remove this power?
3. The proposed changes will not reduce gridlock. Bike lanes are incredibly efficient at moving cyclists.
4. We need to protected bike lanes to encourage more cyclists. Look at what major cities like Paris have done to make cities more cyclable.
5. Adding traffic lanes is not the solution because of induced demand. Eventually more people will use cars further contributing to gridlock.
6. Many people cycle because it is an inexpensive form of transportation. What will happen to the people who can’t cycle any more and also can’t afford cars or transit?
7. Cycling infrastructure helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Does Ontario intend to stay in “car is king” mode for the next decade!
Soumis le 22 octobre 2024 2:49 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
102020
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire