Commentaire
This is a ridiculous, backward piece of legislation. The *only* way to reduce congestion is to remove cars; this has been proven time and time again. You say you are data-driven, but this is laughable. Safe bike lanes give people clean, green and healthy opportunities to get out of their cars. Of course not all car trips can be replaced by bikes, but many can. This creates space for those who cannot use a bicycle to get around. It relieves gridlock for transit as well, which you should be investing in before more roads for private cars. It has been proven in Toronto and many other places that cyclists bring more business to the areas where bike lanes are located. Again - if you are data driven you should know this. When bicycle lanes are separated from car lanes it is safer for both. Interfering with local governments and their transportation plans is out of scope for your ministry.
Given all this, your proposed legislation is anti-health, anti-environment, anti-safety, pro-gridlock, anti-business, anti-small-government....
Get stuffed. This is one of the stupidest things you've proposed, and that's saying a lot.
Soumis le 24 octobre 2024 10:56 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
104441
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire