Commentaire
It feels like the Ontario government wants to focus on making life easier for drivers, when other places in the world with world-class cities are moving in the direction of fewer cars, better public transportation, and better walkability. If anything, this feels like a deliberate move to push Ontario cities (Toronto in particular) in the other direction. This feels like a deliberate lowering of quality of life.
Why isn't the Ontario government working on out-of-the-box solutions to the problem of gridlock? We have an opportunity here to be nimble and forward-thinking. There are so many possibilities for new ideas that could really change the lives of people in Ontario for the better. Why isn't the government working harder to be truly innovative? Positing the removal of bike lanes as the be-all and end-all solution to gridlock and car traffic is dull and regressive.
The plan to prevent new bike lanes and review / remove existing ones feels really short-sighted. There's no future planning here. There only seems to be money spent on removing pre-existing infrastructure for the sake of a grudge against city dwellers and cyclists. What's the Ontario government going to do if the gridlock isn't solved by the removal of bike lanes in municipalities?
Soumis le 24 octobre 2024 1:39 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
104868
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire