Commentaire
* I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS BILL *
* A step backwards for everybody involved *
Time and time again we see in other places that removing pedestrian and cycling infrastructure and pushing people to using cars. Using cars is detrimental to not just the city/municipality, but also to the people because they don't get the chance to be active, and the density of cars vs any other mode
Incentivizing alternative modes of transportation that are more space efficient like public transit and cycling and other active transportation modes.
When you expand a road, travelling by car becomes quicker and easier in the short term. Which makes travelling by car more attractive and so more people are more likely to use their cars than usual.
More car trips = more cars on the road and all that extra space quickly disappears.
The more infrastructure you add of something like bike lanes will make more people bike, especially if you start to expand the network to more main places, Like home, work, school, etc.
Same thing goes with adding more roads or replacing bike lanes with roads people who would have biked to their place will have to take their car.
If you're going to make driving the easiest way to get around a city most people are going to drive, if you're going to make a city where the easiest way around it by biking and walking most people will bike and walk.
Biking is the healthiest greenest best option something the Environmental Registry of Ontario should be promoting not actively taking away!!!
Soumis le 1 novembre 2024 4:42 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
110152
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire