I am opposed to Ontario Bill…

I am opposed to Ontario Bill 212, the Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024, for several important reasons. Removing bike lanes as a strategy to ease traffic congestion is misguided and lacks evidence. In reality, eliminating bike lanes will likely increase traffic issues rather than alleviate them, as research consistently shows that reducing cycling infrastructure leads to more congestion, not less. This action would also put lives at risk, ultimately leading to higher costs for the city in terms of healthcare, emergency services, and legal fees.

Toronto's history provides a clear example of this issue. After bike lanes were removed from Jarvis Street in 2011, city data revealed that travel times actually increased, slowing traffic instead of reducing it. Removing bike lanes not only endangers cyclists but discourages sustainable transportation options, increasing reliance on cars and worsening gridlock.

Instead of adopting policies that compromise safety and weaken urban infrastructure, the province should prioritize investments that genuinely benefit residents, such as improved healthcare and education. These efforts would serve Ontarians far better than dismantling bike lanes to appease drivers and suburban commuters.

In conclusion, Bill 212 is a step backward for both Toronto and Ontario. Sustainable urban planning should promote multimodal transportation solutions that prioritize safety, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. The government's priority should be creating a livable, accessible city for all, not just those who drive to work in the city.