Commentaire
First, I am driver, a cyclist and a pedestrian. We need solutions that work for everyone.
Second, I think everyone agrees that traffic congestion in places like Toronto and Ottawa is a major issue that deserves thoughtful deliberation to achieve real solutions.
Third, safety for cyclists (and pedestrians and motorists) needs to be central to any solution. Removing bike lanes won’t actually reduce cyclists on the road, it will just put them in harms way and increase driver frustration. It will not improve traffic congestion.
Fourth, interfering with municipal plans seems like gross overreach. Municipalities have been developing and implementing cycling infrastructure based on evidence –evidence that cycling infrastructure saves lives, is good for local business, and does not actually have much if any impact on commute times for car drivers. Arguably, more bikes on the road, means less cars.
Fifth, presumably the Ontario government has policy analysts that advise on such matters. It would seem that the ministers and the premier are either not asking their analysts for evidence or willingly ignoring the evidence provided.
Sixth, we elect governments because we believe they will enact policy that is progressive and benefits the population as a whole. This Bill 212 is a disappointment. You can do better.
Soumis le 12 novembre 2024 12:19 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
115048
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire