Commentaire
Bill 212, Framework for Bike Lands is government overreach and an assault on local democracy with no evidence that it will alleviate congestion.
Truly world class cities and regions are embracing active transportation and public transportation, recognizing the primacy of the personal automobile has no place in a modern mega-region. Car dependency is economically inefficient, environmentally destructive and socially isolating. In a city like Toronto, bike lanes save lives, improve business on main streets and provide a safe means to get from point a to b that is cheaper, greener and healthier.
The residents of Toronto voted for a municipal Council that has voted for its cycling network plan, so the idea that the province will overrule local democracy is reprehensible.
This is cynical wedge politics with no basis in evidence.
This proposal will risk lives, cost money and not improve congestion. If bike lanes were truly the cause of congestion than why does every street and highway without a single bike lane also have congestion. This isn't common sense, it is the opposite. The problem is cars.
I urge the government to listen to the experts on real solutions to congestion, like congestion pricing, more frequent and reliable public transportation, less low density sprawl development and more active transportation. Do not take Ontario backwards, while risking lives. This is not good governance or smart decision-making.
References: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-250545…
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/bike-share-toronto-ridership-rec….
Soumis le 16 novembre 2024 1:17 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
116330
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire