Commentaire
Historical trends show that induced demand typically erases any benefits of highway expansions in Ontario within 13–18 months. Rather than expanding highways, public funds would be more impactful if invested in thoughtfully designed transit projects, particularly elevated and high-speed systems.
Elevated transit, such as inverted trains, offers unique advantages:
The space above the tracks could be utilized for wind and solar energy capture.
The design better shields concrete structures from weathering, reducing maintenance issues like those faced by the Gardiner Expressway.
Elevated trains can also coexist with existing roadways without disrupting traffic. Meanwhile, high-speed rail is well-suited to overcome the challenge of limited corridors for true 250 km/h+ rail in Ontario. Both high-speed and local transit systems should feature local, local express, and express modes, with coordinated schedules to make commuting convenient and enjoyable. This approach could encourage more people to leave their cars behind and embrace a stress-free commute.
On Bike Lanes:
Bike lanes are essential public safety infrastructure, not just a transit consideration. For instance, Toronto’s bike lanes on Adelaide and Richmond accommodate approximately 400 additional commuters per rush hour, compared to only about 80 for an extra car lane. Furthermore, bike lanes support emergency services by providing clear routes for ambulances and other vehicles to bypass gridlocked traffic during critical situations. Removing these lanes would jeopardize lives by blocking access for emergency equipment and forcing fire engines to deploy unnecessarily when a smaller, faster vehicle would suffice.
Municipal governments are best equipped to determine the optimal placement of such infrastructure without interference from provincial bureaucracy. Investing in public safety and transit infrastructure allows for safer, more efficient travel while improving the overall quality of life. Reduced car dependency also benefits drivers by alleviating congestion.
On the Overall Impact of the Bill:
As it stands, this bill would lead to increased gridlock, hinder mobility, and create isolated neighbourhoods where residents face limited travel options. A more forward-thinking approach is necessary to ensure Ontario's transportation network supports growth, accessibility, and sustainability.
Soumis le 18 novembre 2024 4:54 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
117018
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire