Commentaire
Indigenous consultation and environmental scans are NOT OPTIONAL. Do them first as is required. If your highway is as great as you say it will be why not back that up with some facts before you build it to prove so?
Planning to take land from suburbanite owners is NOT cool either.
Removing and prohibiting bike lanes WILL cost so much money and have so many negative consequences (safety for ALL road users, cause immediate & future congestion, limit transportation options for people, promote more environmental destruction / pollution, limit safe cycling infrastructure for commuters, utilitarian cyclists and recreational cyclists trying to connect to trails, kids, families, etc.)
This is a municipal issue outlined in many municipal Acts. Are you revising all the acts? Why create more red tape when you created a ministry to get rid/limit red tape?
This is NOT COMMON SENSE. If it were you would have actual fact based information to share with the public and do you due diligence to make an informed decision instead of using your feelings to justify horrible actions because you simply feel like it.
Try to improve lives in Ontario, not make them worse.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 3:03 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
117884
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire