Commentaire
I am deeply concerned about Bill 212 and its potential impact on urban mobility. While I understand the government’s focus on reducing traffic congestion, removing bike lanes undermines efforts to address this. Bike lanes provide a safe space for cyclists, encouraging more people to bike rather than drive, which reduces the number of cars on the road, eases congestion, lowers pollution, and shortens commute times.
If these bike lanes are removed, cyclists will simply ride in regular traffic lanes, which contradicts the bill’s original intention of improving traffic flow. This could make roads less safe and potentially increase congestion.
Bike lanes also promote healthier lifestyles and contribute to a more sustainable, eco-friendly transportation system. Rather than removing them, the focus should be on creating a balanced transportation network that supports both vehicles and cyclists. My colleagues, friends, and family are strongly opposed to Bill 212, and we urge the Ontario government to reconsider this proposal.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 8:21 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
118761
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire