Commentaire
Compelling Arguments Against Bike Lanes on Bloor Street Between Kipling and Jane
1. Dramatic Increase in Commute Times
• Since the installation of bike lanes, commute times for drivers have doubled. This significant increase negatively affects daily productivity, family time, and overall quality of life for residents and commuters.
• The reduced number of lanes for vehicular traffic has created severe bottlenecks, especially during peak hours, when thousands rely on Bloor Street for efficient travel.
2. Underutilization of Bike Lanes
• Observational data shows that the bike lanes on Bloor Street are often empty or underutilized. It is common to see zero cyclists using these lanes on most days, suggesting that the infrastructure does not serve the majority of road users effectively.
• Cyclists often prefer alternate routes, such as the Lakeshore bike trail, which offers safer conditions and scenic benefits, making the Bloor lanes redundant.
3. Increased Pollution and Environmental Harm
• Traffic congestion caused by reduced road capacity has led to idling vehicles, which significantly increases air pollution in the area. This contradicts the environmental goals that bike lanes are meant to support.
• Side streets, now serving as detours for impatient drivers, have also seen increased traffic and emissions, spreading pollution into residential neighborhoods.
4. Safety Hazards in Neighborhood Streets
• The diversion of traffic to smaller side streets has made these areas more dangerous for children and pedestrians. Drivers navigating these routes to avoid gridlock on Bloor often speed or drive recklessly, posing risks to the community.
5. Inefficiency During Public Transit Disruptions
• When the subway is down, Bloor Street becomes a critical alternative for shuttle buses. The reduction to a single lane has proven insufficient to manage both public and private transportation needs, leading to gridlock and forcing many commuters to walk long distances.
• During such disruptions, the inability to clear traffic efficiently undermines the city's capacity to provide reliable transit alternatives.
6. Toronto's Weather Reality
• Toronto experiences snow, rain, and cold weather for nearly half the year, making cycling an impractical mode of transportation during these months. The bike lanes remain largely unused, while drivers and public transit users continue to suffer from reduced road capacity.
7. Lack of Justification for Dedicated Bike Lanes
• For the sake of a few cyclists using the bike lanes sporadically, the city has compromised the efficiency of a vital transportation artery. This is not a balanced or equitable use of public resources.
• Alternate bike-friendly routes, like the Lakeshore trail, provide a safer and more scenic option for cyclists, reducing the need for bike lanes on Bloor Street.
8. Traffic Blockages from Turning Vehicles
• With only one lane in each direction, vehicles turning left create significant backups, bringing all traffic to a halt. This ripple effect compounds congestion and adds to commuter frustration.
________________________________________
Conclusion and Proposed Alternatives
While the intent of bike lanes is to promote sustainable transportation, their placement on Bloor Street between Kipling and Jane has had the opposite effect—creating gridlock, increasing pollution, and reducing road safety in surrounding neighborhoods.
A more effective solution would involve:
1. Redirecting bike lanes to alternate routes, such as quieter streets or scenic trails like those along the Lakeshore, which are safer and more appealing to cyclists.
2. Enhancing public transit options to reduce reliance on cars and avoid overburdening major streets during disruptions.
3. Using dynamic infrastructure planning to ensure that major arteries like Bloor Street remain accessible and efficient for the majority of users.
Removing the bike lanes from Bloor Street would restore balance, reduce gridlock, and improve the overall flow of traffic in the area. This approach respects the needs of all road users while encouraging more practical and impactful sustainability measures.
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 3:23 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
120556
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire