The noise feasibility study,…

The noise feasibility study, aka the noise report, does not meet any of the requirements for an acoustic assessment, or an acoustic audit report as required by the MECP.

The "consultant statutory declaration" does not contain:

A statement from the LEP confirming that affected points of noise reception were determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the EASR publication. Instead, NPC-300 guidelines appear to have been used. The EPA is the governing authority, not NPC-300 or municipal bylaws. (ML Ready Mix Concrete Inc. v Ontario (Environment and Climate Change), 2015 CanLII 78962 (ON ERT), at para 96, <https://canlii.ca/t/gmbxk#par96&gt;)

A statement signed by the person engaging in the prescribed activity confirming that all information the person gave to the LEP in order to prepare the noise report was complete and accurate.

A description of the operational parameters that were determined for the purpose of the noise report.

Among other irregularities

There appears to have been no assessment of the noise generated either directly or indirectly from human activity by the proposed commercial activities on the site.

This feasibility study must be peer reviewed.

This proposal can not be approved until a full acoustic audit report has been conducted and an environmental compliance approval issued.