I strongly object to the…

Numéro du REO

025-1108

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

171322

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses

Commentaire

I strongly object to the proposed Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO) that would restrict building heights at 1875 Steeles Avenue West to a maximum of 33 metres. While I recognize the importance of Sanofi Pasteur’s biomanufacturing campus and its contribution to public health and pandemic preparedness, this MZO represents an inappropriate and disproportionate response that undermines critical housing objectives and sets a troubling precedent for land-use planning in Ontario.

Reasons for Objection:

1. Contrary to Provincial Housing Goals
The Province has repeatedly emphasized the urgent need to increase housing supply, particularly rental housing, in high-demand areas like Toronto. The proposed development at 1875 Steeles Avenue West would deliver over 800 new rental units, replacing an aging 4-storey building with modern housing that meets current standards. Imposing a 33-metre height cap effectively kills this project, exacerbating the housing crisis and contradicting provincial priorities.

2. Misuse of Minister’s Zoning Orders
MZOs were designed to expedite development, not restrict it. Using an MZO to block housing sets a dangerous precedent that could be replicated elsewhere, undermining municipal planning processes and public confidence in transparent decision-making.

3. Unsubstantiated Security Concerns
Sanofi’s claim that residential towers pose a “national security risk” lacks clear evidence. Independent security experts have questioned the validity of these concerns, noting that similar facilities operate safely near residential areas worldwide. Restricting housing based on speculative risks is not sound planning policy.

4. Impact on Complete Communities and Transit-Oriented Growth
The site is located near major transit corridors and employment zones, making it ideal for mixed-use intensification. Limiting height here undermines efforts to create complete communities and leverage existing infrastructure investments.

5. **Precedent for Industrial Encroachment Arguments**
Allowing one private corporation to dictate adjacent land use through provincial intervention could open the door for other industries to block housing projects, further constraining urban growth and affordability.

The proposed MZO is inconsistent with provincial housing objectives, misuses planning tools, and prioritizes speculative corporate concerns over pressing public needs. I urge the Minister to reject this request and allow the Ontario Land Tribunal process to proceed, ensuring a fair and evidence-based resolution.