I don't know a great deal…

I don't know a great deal about Heritage in Ontario but I do understand a few things that Bill 23 may unintentionally harm in its rush to force municipalities to "designate or un-list." Tourism in Ontario and the economic benefits it bring to (especially smaller communities) will be harmed by this bill. Has the government studied these possible economic losses? This in turn will harm local residents ability to afford the housing Bill 23 is supposedly trying to create. In many communities small and large there is NO SHORTAGE of available land to build on. Why force the issue of the convention of municipalities using this "listing" function rather than designation when it doesn't actually put real constraints on the property owner beside providing notice to the city if planning to demolish etc? I have not been able to find a rational in Bill 23 for implementing this chaos creation.
In addition to the negative economic impacts of municipalities losing sites of significance for cultural heritage this Bill also blatantly ignores Indigenous communities and any different types of strategies they may need to protect areas of significance for their communities. It is not honouring Ontario's commitment to the TRC recommendations or UNDRIP. Has the government studied how these changes to the Ontario Heritage Act will impact Indigenous communities? Has any consultation been done?