Commentaire
This consultation is not inclusive as it allows only to people who has access to a computer/ internet with digital literacy. It exclude other minority groups in the society.
The plan is to remove more environmentally significant land and add few farm lands to the stock won't do the math and justification to the natural system.
It is important to build more dwelling units but non renewable natural resources should not be granted.
We are experiencing the consequences of urban sprawl, such as green house gases, traffic issues, poor air quality link to cancer etc. Removing the identified land from "conservation" status will make more problems and it is not worth, compared to the number of single detached houses with large footprints on those lands.
It is important to take decisions based on facts and scientific research. The proposal seems to be a plan rushed without proper study and consultation with the experts nor public.
Soumis le 25 novembre 2022 7:34 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications au Plan de la ceinture de verdure
Numéro du REO
019-6216
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
73481
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire