Commentaire
I am concerned that cutting parkland dedication in half will result in communities with insufficient parkland facilities. COVID-19 has demonstrated the need for parkland of various types, including linear parkland, particularly for people who live in higher density communities. Although I’m unconvinced it will make housing more affordable, even changing the proposed standard to one hectare per 450 dwelling units in the first case and one hectare for each 750 dwelling units would be an improvement over the current proposal.
Though I support the direction of increasing the amount of rental housing built, I remain concerned that the development charge reduction will neither adequately incentivize building nor result in sufficient funds for the municipal infrastructure needed to support growth. Some municipalities have already offered this type of reduction, and it has not resulted in a significant increase in building rental housing. Instead, I would rather see a focus on the non-profit and government owned housing sectors.
Soumis le 9 décembre 2022 3:02 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées à la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire et à la Loi de 1997 sur les redevances d’aménagement : Fournir une plus grande certitude quant aux coûts des redevances d’aménagement municipales
Numéro du REO
019-6172
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
80976
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire