Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20574

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you to ask that you protect the Greenbelt and therefore call back legislature and introduce a new Bill 66 that stops the attacks on the Greenbelt, Oak Ridges Moraine, Lake Simcoe, Source Water Protection Areas and other important protected farm and natural areas to development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20575

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. These protections are not inefficient, ineffective, or out of date... Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20579

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do NOT support Bill 66. The impact we make on the environment today will result in negative consequences for generations to come. This bill is a threat to human life and to democracy, as it puts the needs of businesses over the needs of living beings. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20581

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If you haven’t accepted that we share this world with an extremely large number of species, whose existence benefits the entire eco system, then you have sadly been misguided. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20582

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 was introduced in December to open our Green Belt for development, which will put 2 million acres of natural areas, habitats and wetlands at risk of development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20583

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My family immigrated to Ontario in 1953 from England. Within a year (October 1954) Toronto and surrounding area was hit by one of the worst storms in our history, Hurricane Hazel. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20584

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario has a rich history of occupation that dates back more than 12,000 years. The archaeological assessments completed each year in advance of development help fill in the gaps in the story of our Province, Indigenous Peoples and more recent settlers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20585

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am appalled at the introduction of Bill 66 to promote business development at the expense of the environment and wildlife. I do not agree with proposed amendments to the Planning Act as set out in Bill 66, the Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20586

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to this bill because of the potential threat it poses to our water supply and green belt. The government has a responsibility to safeguard these resources for future generations. This shortsighted bill fails to guarantee this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20590

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal favours the corporations only..it dismisses the importance of environment when it is the environment, and their protective procedures that must remain as precedence in all types of development.. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20591

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

PLEASE! Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20592

Commentaire fait au nom

Friends of the Rouge Watershed Inc.

Statut du commentaire

RE: 013-4293 Bill 66: Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018; 013-4125 Proposed open-for-business planning tool; 013-4239 New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business planning tool Dear Mr. Helfinger and Ontario Government, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20598

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly am against bill 66 rural Ontario needs to keep the green belt preserve heritage towns protect the rivers Protect our waters Development moving into these areas will destroy our rural heritage It's all about money greedy developers and politicans Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20599

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This act is short-sighted and ill-conceived. It will benefit corporations and their executives while imposing long-term costs on others. In particular, Schedule 5 will encourage relaxation of pollution controls and increase the risk of exposure to toxic chemicals for people and other organisms. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20600

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt is a key differentiator for businesses and individuals planning on investing in the golden horseshoe region of Ontario. Maintenance and preservation of these resources make long-term sense for Ontario and its residents. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20603

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose Bill 22. There is no need for an airport and the land should be treasured as Class A farmland that can feed the GTA, Ontario and beyond.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20605

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Any reduction to regulations regarding health and safety and the environment is endangering our communities and the future that our children will inherit. Removing articles 4, 5, and 10 would be considered prudent. Lire davantage